There have been lots of reports about the 2011 census statistics for religious affiliation, and how they compare with a decade before.
Here is the actual summary from the Office for National Statistics:
The question on religious affiliation in the census was introduced in 2001 and is voluntary. The order of the main religion groups by size did not change between 2001 and 2011. Those affiliated with the Christian religion remained the largest group; 59 per cent (33.2 million) of usual residents in England and Wales.
This is a decrease of 13 percentage points since 2001 when 72 per cent (37.3 million) of usual residents stated their religion as Christian. It is the only group to have experienced a decrease in numbers between 2001 and 2011 despite population growth.
The second largest response category in 2011 was no religion. This increased 10 percentage points from 15 per cent (7.7 million) of usual residents in 2001, to 25 per cent (14.1 million) in 2011.
The next most stated religion in England and Wales was Muslim with five per cent (2.7 million) of usual residents stating their religion as Muslim in the 2011 Census; an increase of two percentage points since 2001 when three per cent (1.5 million) of usual residents stated that they were Muslim.
And the table:
England and Wales, 2001 and 2011, all usual residents
Religion | 2001 | 2011 | Change | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Per cent | Number | Per cent | Number | Percentage point | |
Christian | 37,338 | 71.7 | 33,243 | 59.3 | -4,095 | -12.4 |
No religion | 7,709 | 14.8 | 14,097 | 25.1 | 6,388 | 10.3 |
Muslim | 1,547 | 3.0 | 2,706 | 4.8 | 1,159 | 1.8 |
Hindu | 552 | 1.1 | 817 | 1.5 | 264 | 0.4 |
Sikh | 329 | 0.6 | 423 | 0.8 | 94 | 0.2 |
Jewish | 260 | 0.5 | 263 | 0.5 | 3 | 0.0 |
Buddhist | 144 | 0.3 | 248 | 0.4 | 103 | 0.1 |
Other religion | 151 | 0.3 | 241 | 0.4 | 90 | 0.1 |
Religion not stated | 4,011 | 7.7 | 4,038 | 7.2 | 27 | -0.5 |
The report goes on to look at the regional variations.
Between 2001 and 2011 the percentage of residents affiliating themselves with the Christian religion declined in all England regions and Wales.
The highest percentage, 68 per cent (1.8 million) of people who responded that their religion was Christian was in the North East. This represents a 12 percentage point decrease on 2001, when this region also had the highest percentage of people who stated that their religion was Christian. London had the lowest percentage of usual residents stating their religion as Christian in both 2011 (48 per cent, 4.0 million) and 2001 (58 per cent, 4.2 million).
London had the highest percentage of all other religious affiliations except Sikh; Muslim (12 per cent, 1.0 million), Hindu (five per cent, 411,000), Jewish (two per cent, 149,000), Buddhist (one per cent, 82,000), and other religion (less than one per cent, 48,000). The West Midlands had the highest percentage of people who responded that their religion was Sikh (two per cent, 30,000).
These are huge changes. How does one react? For a completely unrepresentative but still interesting range of reactions see the Telegraph blog page, where Damian Thompson is depressed (‘It cannot be said too often: the default position of people born since 1980 is agnosticism or atheism‘ – his emphasis!); Christina Odone still manages to find hope (Headline: ‘2011 census shock revelation: Christianity is still the majority religion, and Britain is still a God-fearing country’); and atheist Tom Chivers wonders what it means for the nation’s ‘moral capital’:
What’s worth saying, though, is that as well as the (in many people’s opinion) negative social attitudes it [religion] can entrench, it also has clear and well-documented social benefits. Communities based around a local church (or mosque, or synagogue) are more likely to know each other, more likely to help each other in times of crisis, generally more likely to behave in socially positive ways.Religion, according to the moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt, builds up “moral capital“: norms and practices that encourage cooperation within groups, by making people think of themselves as part of that group, rather than an individual. Some of those norms and practices (avoiding pork, or eating a biscuit that represents the Son of God) might seem bizarre to outsiders, but they bring the group closer together. It’s the flip-side of the us-and-them attitude; religion might or might not be bad for your attitude towards “them”, but it’s generally good for your attitude towards “us”.
Not that it’s exclusive to religion, of course. Regular social contact with your neighbours, the building of social and moral capital, the creation of a group in which you subsume your individuality and can work for a common good, can all be achieved in other means: it might sound a bit flippant, but football supporters might feel something similar. The British Humanist Association, which runs church-like regular meetings for humanists, and groups like the Quakers, with their emphasis on community rather than the “religious” side of religion, could build social and moral capital without the need for God or the supernatural. But the point is that right now, as Haidt says, that “religious believers … are happier, healthier, longer-lived, and more generous to charity and to each other than are secular people” (in the United States, at least). This needs to be acknowledged. If religion really is waning in this country (and it seems to be: the number of Muslims is growing, but nowhere near fast enough to replace Christianity), then the challenge for atheists, humanists and others who think it’s possible to be good without God is to build a way of bringing communities together as Christianity has in Britain for centuries.
Emmmnnn!
I left this post to go away and look up God fearing, I of course knew its meaning, but wondered if it was broader than my understanding. It was in some research.
I think using this old testament antiquated image today is not good for promoting our intimate relationship with Our Loving Father. One should not live in fear.
The ultimate Love of God, in all its awesomeness is a lesson of Love, however challenging. And the way we learn to respect His Word is not through spending our lives fearing His wrath, but through aspiring to His Loving example by learning to be an intimate and loving disciple and by emanating that to others.
“religious believers … are happier, healthier, longer-lived, and more generous to charity and to each other than are secular people”
I had a blessed secular childhood and am now a Catholic. My experience challenges the above.
These figures, concerning as they are for the decline in religious affiliation, still show a lot of cause for optimism. It shows that there are still millions out there who are seeking for something beyond the material things of life, the transcendent if you like. What the figures do not show is the number of people who are still seeking for something. I am reminded at this point of the number of times I have heard someone say “There’s got to be more to life than just this”.
I remain optimistic. Though I would prefer to say that Britain is a God-seeking country rather than God-fearing.
[…] Bridges and Tangents – Religion in the UK in decline? https://bridgesandtangents.wordpress.com/2012/12/12/religion-in-the-uk-in-decline/ […]
[…] this comes as the results of 2011 census show four million fewer self-processed Christians than in 2001. The loss of this common faith is a symptom and a cause of the movement towards ever-more islands […]