I’ve just given a study day about the internet and new media, and it forced me to get my head around some of the jargon and the ideas. Here is my summary of what these terms mean and where the digital world is going.
Web 1.0: The first generation of internet technology. You call up pages of text and images with incredible speed and facility. It’s no different from strolling through a library, only much quicker. The operative verb is I LOOK. I look at pages on the screen just as I look at pages in a book. All content is provided for you – it’s a form of publishing. It may be updated in a way that is impossible when a solid book is sitting on your shelf, but you can’t change the content yourself.
Web 2.0: The second generation of internet technology allows for user-generated content. You don’t just look at the pages, you alter them. You write your own blog; you comment on someone else’s article in the comment boxes; you edit an entry on Wikipedia. And then, by extension, with basically the same technology, you share your thoughts on a social networking site, which means you are commenting not on a static site, but on something that is itself in flux. You have moved from action to interaction; from connection to interconnection. If Web 1.0 is like a digital library, Web 2.0 is like a digital ‘Letter to the Editor’, a digital conference call, a digital group discussion. The verb here is I PARTICIPATE.
Web 3.0: People disagree about the meaning of Web 3.0, about where the web is now going. I like John Smart‘s idea of an emerging Metaverse, where there is a convergence of the virtual and physical world. In the world of Web 2.0, of user-generated content and social networking, you stand in the physical/natural/real world and use the new media to help you around that world – the new media are tools. You talk to friends, you share ideas, you buy things that have been suggested and reviewed by others. But in Web 3.0 the new media become an essential part of the world in which you are living, they help to create the world, and you live within them.
The border between Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 is not tidy here, because Web 3.0 is partly about Web 2.0 becoming all-pervasive and continuous, so that your connection with the web and your social network is an essential part of every experience – it doesn’t get switched off. The mobile earpiece is always open to the chatter of others; the texts and status updates of your friends are projected into the corner of your Google Glasses (like those speedometers that are projected onto the car windscreen) so that they accompany what you are doing at every moment – the connection between real and virtual, between here and there, is seamless; the attention you give to every shop or product or street or person is digitally noted, through the head and eye movement sensors built into your glasses and the GPS in your phone, and simultaneously you are fed (into the corner of your glasses, or into your earpiece) layers of information about what is in front of you – reviews of the product, reminders of what you need to buy from the shop, warnings about the crime rate on this street, a note about the birthday and the names of the children of the person you are about to pass, etc. This is augmented reality or enhanced reality or layered reality.
It’s no different, in essence, from going for a stroll in the mid-70s with your first Walkman – creating for the first time your own soundtrack as you wander through the real world; or having the natural landscape around you altered by neon lights and billboards. But it is this experience a thousand times over, so that it is no longer possible to live in a non-virtual world, because every aspect of the real world is already augmented by some aspect of virtual reality. The verb here is I EXIST. I don’t just look at the virtual world, or use it to participate in real relationships; now I exist within this world.
Web 4.0: Some people say this is the Semantic Web (‘semantics’ is the science of meaning), when various programmes, machines, and the web itself becomes ‘intelligent’, and starts to create new meanings that were not programmed into it, and interact with us in ways that were not predicted or predictable beforehand. It doesn’t actually require some strict definition of ‘artificial intelligence’ or ‘consciousness’ for the computers; it just means that they start doing new things themselves – whatever the philosophers judge is or is not going on in their ‘minds’.
Another aspect of Web 4.0, or another definition, concerns plugging us directly into the web: when the boundary between us and the virtual world disappears. This is when the virtual world becomes physically/biologically part of us, or when we become physically/biologically part of the virtual world. When, in other words, the data is not communicated by phones or earpieces or glasses, but is implanted into us, so that the virtual data is part of our consciousness directly, and not just part of our visual or aural experience (the films Total Recall, eXistenZ, and the Matrix); and/or, when we control the real and virtual world by some kind of brain or neural interface, so that – in both cases – there really is a seamless integration of the real and the virtual, the personal/biological and the digital.
If this seems like science fiction, remember that it is already happening in smaller ways. See previous posts on Transhumanism, and the MindSpeller project at Leuven which can read the minds of stroke victims, and this MIT review of brain-computer interfaces. In this version of Web 4.0 the verb is not I exist (within a seamless real/virtual world), it is rather I AM this world and this world is me.
Watch this fascinating video of someone’s brainwaves controlling a robotic arm:
And this which has someone controlling first a signal on a screen, and then another robotic arm:
So this is someone making things happen in the real world just by thinking! (Which, come to think of it, is actually the miracle that takes place whenever we doing anything consciously!)
Any comments? Are you already living in Web 3.0 or 3.5? Do you like the idea of your children growing up in Web 4.0? What will Web 5.0 be?
Bridges and Tangents 
Web 5.0 – I Create! Finally we’ll all be God! We’ll think “I fancy a cup of tea” and one will appear.
This could only be a vision of those who live in affluence in affluent cities, cut off from creation and the real world. Like London.
Meanwhile over half the world’s population is starving, billions have little or no access to clean water and sanitation, and anthropogenic global warming is causing the fastest rates of species extinction ever experienced by this planet. Our ‘development’ has only happened, and can only ‘progress’, as long as the rest of the world is kept in abject poverty because there simply aren’t enough resources on one planet for everyone to exist in this digital universe. And who would want to anyway? For ‘from the dust you have come and to the dust you shall return.’ Our calling is to be creation’s ‘song of praise’ to the Creator on the one hand, and God’s gift to creation on the other. This technological world/vision is built on the back of ‘capitalist’ imperialism, selfishness and greed. It cannot be separated from the economic power and exploitation on which it stands, from wilful blindness to Christ’s presence in the world’s poor.
So what does it have to do with the Gospel?
The first word that entered my head was ‘unbelievable’. But I guess I would have said this when I was eleven and teachers at school had said there would be a thing named the ‘internet’ which would make access to information a two minute affair rather than the two hour trip down to the local Library.
Ps; The things described are those that the next generation will take for granted and use easily. Quite what the effects will be remain to be seen
Thank you Stephen for this clear explanation of what is so simple, yet made complex by its sheer audacity.
I still marvel at electricity. Imagine the natural energy that compels protons and electrons and all matter of wave stuff that has as its prime purpose is to move.
I was working in a village in a distant developing country where we had movement of this type for two hours every second evening. I learned to charge my phone and camera and computer batteries; and to appreciate. I walked along side people who were living within more personal explosions. Trauma, grief and dispossession. Yes, even our brothers and sisters in poor villages are in this wave-web-digital evolution with us. I saw mobile phones and flat screen television sets in homes with no running water, being watched by children with skinny legs and bloated stomachs.
Yet, this WEB phenomena occupies a place in the imagination and real lives of all on the earth and while I am excited about the fact that a farmer can determine which square metre of soil needs more fertiliser by looking at his computer, I am gobsmacked by the melding of imagination and flesh. This to me has incarnational ramifications. The Resurrection was not a moment in time and while I understand the echoes of relational power and connectedness, different links are being revealed in ways that shatter and reveal anew our understandings of our final frontier. This is not a simple notion of death or annihilation, our final meeting is (as it has been since the beginning) our submersion of the ego into the source of all the energies, into what we name as the divine.
Exciting, sure is, especially when the wings of hope and joy are unfurled and energised by the sinew of determination, wisdom and memory.
Thank you mr. stephene. u explained it batter. i also agree with MINSTER, he is talking abt deficit of inclusion n sustainability. but he should understand tht its jst a explanation of term. if one explain what air conditioner is it ? its does not meant that everybody does not h has an AC so we should not explain it.